Voice phishing is no longer a crime that merely uses awkward speech to demand a bank transfer. Criminals combine leaked personal information, sophisticated impersonation of institutions, remote-control apps, fake investment platforms, information from family members’ social media, and AI-generated voices to undermine victims’ judgment.
Middle-aged and older adults, in particular, may be heavily targeted because they have accumulated a certain level of assets but may be unfamiliar with new apps and security procedures. However, anyone can be deceived in an emergency regardless of age or digital proficiency, so it is important to establish multiple verification procedures involving family members and financial institutions rather than relying on individual vigilance.
What to Keep in Mind When Reading 2025 Loss Statistics
According to National Police Agency figures cited in materials provided by the operator, domestic voice phishing losses in 2025 reached KRW 1.2578 trillion, exceeding KRW 1 trillion for the first time, and more than half of the victims were reportedly aged 50 or older.
However, voice phishing, messenger phishing, investment tip room scams, romance scams, and similar crimes may be classified as different types of crime depending on the reporting agency and statistical criteria. When comparing losses or the proportions by age group, the following conditions should also be checked.
- Whether the figures are based on the year the crime occurred or the year it was reported or solved
- Whether only bank-transfer-based voice phishing was included
- Whether virtual asset investment scams and investment tip room scams were included
- Whether the figures refer to the number of victims, incidents, or transfers
- Whether the figures are preliminary or final
Therefore, rather than exaggerating the risk based on a single figure, it is advisable to examine the type of crime and the scope of the statistics together.
5 Major Tactics Used in New Types of Voice Phishing
1. Impersonating Prosecutors, Police, or the Financial Supervisory Service
Criminals gain trust by presenting information that has already been leaked, such as the victim’s name, workplace, address, and financial institutions they use. They then threaten that the victim’s account has been linked to a crime or that the victim may be arrested, and demand a transfer or cash handoff while preventing the victim from ending the call.
If any of the following demands are made, institutional impersonation should be suspected first.
- They tell the victim not to inform family members or bank employees, citing investigation confidentiality.
- They instruct the victim to move money to a safe account, protected account, or government-managed account.
- They ask the victim to send money for an asset inspection or to determine whether the assets are linked to a crime.
- They instruct the victim to withdraw cash and hand it to a specific person.
- They send images resembling identification cards or official documents through a messenger app.
Real investigative agencies do not instruct people by phone to move money from their personal accounts to other accounts under the pretext of inspecting their assets. Caller ID information and images of official documents can be manipulated, so they must not be used by themselves to verify identity.
2. Inducing Victims to Install Malicious or Remote-Control Apps
Criminals send links under the pretext of checking a case, strengthening security, applying for a loan, receiving a refund, or confirming card delivery. If the installed app obtains excessive accessibility permissions, screen-sharing access, text-message access, or device administrator privileges, calls and financial authentication processes may be exposed.
Remote support programs such as AnyDesk are also used for legitimate work. The danger arises when an unknown person instructs someone over the phone to install one and asks for an access code or control permissions.
On a phone suspected of having a malicious app, simply searching for an institution’s number and calling it directly may not be enough. Search ads or fake websites may appear, and the malicious app may manipulate the call screen or redirect the call to another number. Turn off the phone or disconnect it from the network, and contact the institution’s official main number using another, uninfected phone.
3. Messenger Phishing That Impersonates Children or Family Members
Typical messages say, “My phone is broken,” “I can’t talk right now,” or “I need to make an urgent payment.” Criminals may request not only a transfer but also a photo of an ID, a card number, an account password, or a verification code.
Recently, criminals have collected school, workplace, travel schedule, and family nickname information from public social media posts to make conversations sound natural. Even if the profile photo and family information are accurate, that does not prove the person is actually a family member.
To verify, stop the messenger conversation and call the originally saved number directly. If the person cannot be reached, verify through a previously known contact network, such as another family member or the person’s workplace.
4. Investment Tip Rooms and Fake Trading Platforms
Criminals approach victims through free stock recommendations or advertisements impersonating famous experts, then direct them to group chat rooms. Other participants repeatedly post proof of profits, but these may also be accounts operated by the criminal organization.
Profits displayed in a fake app or website are not real assets. Criminals may allow one small withdrawal to gain trust before inducing the victim to increase the investment. When the victim requests a withdrawal, they demand additional payments for taxes, deposits, membership upgrades, or anti-money-laundering verification fees.
The following combination is a very strong warning sign.
- They promise both principal protection and unusually high returns.
- They instruct the victim to deposit money into accounts held in individuals’ names or accounts that keep changing.
- They demand that taxes or fees be paid in advance before a withdrawal.
- It is difficult to verify the company’s registration as a financial institution or its actual office.
- They emphasize credibility solely through celebrity photos and media outlet logos.
Deposits covered by deposit insurance and products with legally established guarantee structures do exist separately, so not every product can be deemed fraudulent merely because it uses the phrase “principal protection.” However, when a stranger promotes a high-return investment while claiming the principal is protected, it is a signal to stop the transaction immediately.
5. Impersonating Family Members With AI-Generated Voices and Videos
If publicly available voice or video material exists, generative AI can be used to imitate a specific person’s voice and face. The quality of the synthesis varies depending on the source material, model, and call environment, so it is inaccurate to describe it using fixed figures such as “it can be replicated with 99% accuracy in just a few seconds.”
The important point is that identity must not be confirmed based on voice and video alone. Even if the caller presents an urgent story involving kidnapping, an accident, or hospital bills, end the call first and verify through an independent contact channel. Video calls may also be generated or use prerecorded footage, so they are not sufficient as a standalone means of verification.
A 30-Second Response When You Receive a Call or Message
- Do not carry out the request. Stop any transfer, cash withdrawal, app installation, screen sharing, or transmission of personal information.
- Hang up without explaining or arguing. The longer the call continues, the more you are exposed to fear and time pressure.
- Verify through another channel. Contact family members using their previously saved numbers, and contact institutions using the main numbers listed on their official websites or documents.
- If you installed an app, use another device. Put the affected phone in airplane mode or turn it off.
- If you sent money, report it immediately. Ask the bank’s customer service center and the police at 112 to freeze the payment.
It is safer not to use phone numbers from search-result advertisements, numbers provided by the other party, or links in text messages for verification.
Verification Rules for Families to Establish Together
A family passphrase can serve as a supplementary way to identify AI impersonation. However, it may be leaked if it remains in messenger records or on social media, so it must not be relied on by itself.
Recommended family verification rules include the following.
- When a transfer request is received, always call back using the previously saved number.
- Designate a second family member or acquaintance to contact if the person cannot be reached.
- Do not record the passphrase online, and change it periodically.
- Ask about a recent family experience that would be difficult for the other person to look up.
- Transfers at or above a set amount should be made only after verification by two family members.
- Reduce the visibility of phone numbers, schools, workplaces, travel schedules, and family relationships on social media.
Do not send money merely because the person answered the passphrase correctly. Independent verification by calling back through an existing contact number is essential.